Legal Opinion

People v. Griffith

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 10, 1960No. Crim. 3029PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment based upon a jury verdict finding appellant guilty of a violation of section 476 of the Penal Code (uttering a fictitious cheek) and from the order denying a new trial. On February 8, 1959, appellant was staying in the Mayflower Hotel in San Francisco with his codefendant, Lorraine Lawson, where they had been living as husband and wife for some time. While in the Mayflower Hotel Lorraine wrote a number of checks drawn on a bank in Auburn with which she had no account. These checks she passed at grocery stores in the neighborhood. A police investigation began.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. BushtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. People v. SimpsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. People v. ThourwaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. Norwood v. KenfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. WoodsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. People v. HardinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. State v. HollyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. People v. SummersvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API