Kotesky v. Davis
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, C. J.
This is an appeal from a decree for specific performance of a land contract. Plaintiffs have paid the purchase price in full. Defendants refuse to convey and have served notice of intention to forfeit the contract on the ground that plaintiffs have violated its restriction reading as follows:
“The above land shall be used for residential and/ or agricultural purposes only. The above land shall not be used as a storage or sales place for used autos, auto parts, trucks, junk, tin cans, paper, or garbage.”
The alleged violation consists of plaintiffs’ use of the parcel of land involved as a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sanborn v. McLeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Los Angeles Terminal Land Co. v. MuirCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Putnam v. ErnstMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Sloman v. CutlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Godley v. WeismanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- AUTO CLUB INS. ASSOCIATION v. Frederick & Herrud, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- Fong v. HashimotoHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
- Fong v. HashimotoHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1998
- Abraham v. Walter Neller CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- Abraham v. Walter Neller CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.