Legal Opinion

Mooney v. City of Overland Park

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 23, 2007No. 95,468PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnson, J.:

Herbert M. Mooney and Enid G. Mooney (landowners) appeal the jury’s determination of the value of their property which was taken by the City of Overland Park (City) via its eminent domain powers. The landowners challenge the district court’s exclusion of their proffered testimony about a prior sale of a portion of their land and the court’s admission of testimony about a prior appraisal. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

The property at issue is a tract of land in Overland Park of approximately 1.02 acres, which was improved with a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. GunbySupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  2. State v. HeathSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  3. City of Wichita v. EisenringSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  4. Rostine v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  5. Board of Education, Unified School District No. 464 v. PorterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In the Interest of J.D.C.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. City of Mission Hills v. SextonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  3. Miller v. GLACIER DEVELOPMENT CO., LLCSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  4. Manhattan Ice & Cold Storage, Inc. v. City of ManhattanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  5. Castleberry v. DeBrotSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API