Legal Opinion

Basche-Sage Hdw. Co. v. De Wolfe

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1925PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPipes, J.

As we must dismiss this appeal, we confine this statement to the matters pertaining to the question decided.

The plaintiff filed a complaint containing five separate causes of action. A demurrer was interposed to each of the causes of action alleged. The demurrer was sustained as to the first cause of action and overruled as to the other four. Time was given to the plaintiff to amend its pleading. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint, making some changes in its first cause of action, and repeated the allegations of the original complaint in. respect to the other causes of action. A motion was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Glenn v. SavageOregon Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Schmidt v. Oregon Gold Mining Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Taylor v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Twitchell v. RisleyOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Kesler v. NiceOregon Supreme Court · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Russell v. SheahanOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Rauda v. Oregon Roses, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Cofield v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  4. Welbourn v. Firemen's InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Rorvik v. Astoria Box & Paper Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API