Legal Opinion
Rannels v. S. E. Nichols, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 22, 1978No. Civ. A. 77-4299PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
TROUTMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Carol Rannels, is a citizen of Pennsylvania bringing this diversity action against defendant S. E. Nichols, Inc., a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of New York with its principal place of business in New York, alleging that defendant is liable for the torts of malicious prosecution and defamation. Although not clearly stated, jurisdiction is apparently invoked under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 by reason of the diversity of citizenship.
Plaintiff alleges that on June 25, 1977, she purchased a pair of ladies’ jeans at defendant^…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Nelson v. KeeferCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- Cosgrove Studio & Camera Shop, Inc. v. PaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Publix Drug Co. v. Breyer Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Altman v. Standard Refrig. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Bausewine v. Norristown Herald, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Agriss v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Carol A. Rannels, Lynn L. Rannels v. S. E. Nichols, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Bunch v. Artec International Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- McDonnell Corp. v. City of Lancaster, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1982