Maicobo Investment Corporation v. Von Der Heide
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
THOMSEN, Chief Judge.
The several defendants have moved to dismiss portions of the amended complaint in this case and for a summary judgment with respect to other portions. The facts relied on in support of or in opposition to the motions for summary judgment are matters of record in a previous State court proceeding. The issues will be more clearly understood if those facts and the facts alleged in the amended complaint are stated first.
Facts
Under date of August 6, 1960, plaintiff (Maicobo) and two of the defendants herein, Nomita Von Der Heide and Amalia de M. Riggs (Von Der Heide and Riggs)…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- La Salle National Bank v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
- Kimball v. HarmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871
- Urtz v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Sterling v. Local 438, Liberty Ass'n of Steam & Power Pipe Fitters & Helpers' Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Klein v. WhiteheadCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Goodman v. PolandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1975
- Charles County Broadcasting Co. v. MearesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Asibem Assoc., Ltd. v. RillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Annapolis Urban Renewal Authority v. Interlink, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.