Legal Opinion

Birch v. County of Orange

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 28, 1927No. Docket No. 3361PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

The plaintiffs brought two actions, under the provisions of section 3819 of the Political Code, to recover excess taxes paid by them under protest for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1916. The actions were consolidated and tried together. Judgment was entered in favor of the defendant and this appeal is from the judgment. In a former trial judgment of nonsuit was entered. That judgment was reversed on appeal. (Birch v. County of Orange, 186 Cal. 736 [200 Pac. 647].) The second trial was had upon the same pleadings as the first.

The plaintiffs own a tract of oil land about a quarter of a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Birch v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Mahoney v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Wild Goose Country Club v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. Wells, Fargo & Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Birch v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. County of Sacramento v. HickmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Robinson v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Griffith v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Glidden Company v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Michels v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API