Legal Opinion

In Re Quinn

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 17, 1994No. C5-92-2526, C0-92-2529, C4-93-132, C6-93-133 and C8-93-134PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

517 N.W.2d 895 (1994)

In re Access to Law Enforcement Records Relating to the Arrest of Peter Daniel QUINN on November 10, 1992.

Nos. C5-92-2526, C0-92-2529, C4-93-132, C6-93-133 and C8-93-134.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

June 17, 1994.

Paul R. Hannah, Laurie R. Zenner, Hannah & Zenner, St. Paul, for Pioneer Press.

John P. Borger, Thomas S. Schroeder, Faegre & Benson, Minneapolis, for Star Tribune.

Joseph M. Crosby, Steven T. Grimshaw, Crosby & Grimshaw, Minneapolis, for Jane Doe.

Ronald I. Meshbesher, James H. Gilbert, John P. Sheehy, Jack S. Nordby, Meshbesher & Spence, Mpls., for A.B., C.D. & E.F.

M…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. C. A.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. State v. CarriereSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. Demers v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  4. In re Access to Law Enforcement Records Relating to the Arrest of QuinnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  5. In Re QuinnCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. M.D.T.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  2. State v. S.L.H.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  3. State v. H.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  4. State v. N.G.K.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  5. State v. V.A.J.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API