Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Commonwealth Casualty Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 16, 1923PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRADLEY,'J.

Plaintiff filed his petition in three counts. In the first he sought the equity side of the court and asked that an accident insurance contract be so reformed as to conform to the agreement he had with the soliciting agent. In the second count plaintiff sought recovery on the reformed contract. In the third count he sought recovery on the policy delivered to him; but this count was dismissed. A jury was waived on the law count, and the whole cause tried before the court. The court reformed the policy and found for plaintiff on the second count based upon the reformed contract.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williamson v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  2. Horine v. Royal InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Aetna Life Insurance v. American Zinc, Lead & Smelting Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Faith v. Home Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1919

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. National Automobile & Casualty Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. St. Louis County National Bank v. Maryland Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Points v. WillsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Electro Battery Mfg. v. Commercial Union Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1991
  5. Commercial Casualty Ins. Co. v. VarnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API