Legal Opinion
Sidney v. Zah
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 25, 1983No. 82-5375PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
718 F.2d 1453
Ivan L. SIDNEY, Chairman of the Hopi Tribal Council of the
Hopi Indian Tribe, For and On Behalf of the Hopi Indian
Tribe, Including All Villages and Clans Thereof, and on
Behalf of Any and All Hopi Indians Claiming Any Interest In
the Lands Described In the Executive Order Dated December
16, 1882, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee,
v.
Peter ZAH,* Chairman of the Navajo Tribal
Council of the Navajo Indian Tribe For and On Behalf of the
Navajo Indian Tribe, Including All Villages and Clans
Thereof, and On Behalf of Any and All Navajo Indians
Claiming Any Interest In the Lands Described In the
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- White Mountain Apache Tribe v. BrackerSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Clinton v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Media Rights Technologies, Inc v. Microsoft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Irwin v. MascottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Golden State Transit Corporation a California Corporation v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Lowenschuss v. Selnick (In re Lowenschuss)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.