Legal Opinion

Townsend v. Carmel

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 18, 1980No. Civ. A. 79-0746PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

AUBREY E. ROBINSON, Jr., District Judge.

Before the Court are five motions requiring resolution, to wit: (1) Individual Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, (2) Official Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, (3) Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend the Complaint, (4) Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Defendants to Show Cause and for Attorney’s Fees, and (5) Defendants’ Motion for a Protective Order. Plaintiffs bring this action against two individual Federal officials seeking damages, and against the United States and a number of officials seeking declaratory and injunctive relief. Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. L. Patrick Gray, III v. Griffin BellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  2. Rafael Medina v. United States of America, No. 00-2156Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
  3. Guerra v. SuttonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Williams, Theodore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. StansellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API