JOH. A. BENCKISER G. Mb H., CHEM. F. v. Hygrade Food Prod. Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
COOLAHAN, District Judge:
I. Plaintiff brings this action for infringement of its patent on certain food preservatives. He has refused to produce some of the documents requested in defendant’s Motion under Rule 34, 28 U.S. C. , F.R.Civ.P. Plaintiff contends that since the documents are communications between himself and one Michael Striker which were made in reference to application for the patent while Mr. Striker was plaintiff’s patent agent, they are protected under the attorney-client privilege. Although Mr. Striker has since become a member of the New York State Bar, he was not an…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
- Sperry v. Florida Ex Rel. Florida BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Falsone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1954
- Georgia-Pacific Plywood Co. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
- Hercules Inc. v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
- Burlington Industries v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1974
- Mendenhall v. Barber-Greene Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
- In re Ampicillin Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.