Dunnigan v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
This uncertified class action raises a narrow but important issue that remains unsettled in the Second Circuit, namely whether a plan beneficiary may maintain an action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., solely to recover interest on plan benefits that were paid after a period of delay. Although the majority of courts to consider this issue have found that ERISA does not provide a remedy for those who seek interest on delayed benefit payments rather than payment of benefits themselves, both…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Dunnigan v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Helen Dunnigan, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Douglas Dobson v. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc., Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Harrison v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Torah Soft Ltd. v. DrosninDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.