Legal Opinion

Dunnigan v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 8, 2000No. 99 CIV. 4059(SAS)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.

This uncertified class action raises a narrow but important issue that remains unsettled in the Second Circuit, namely whether a plan beneficiary may maintain an action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., solely to recover interest on plan benefits that were paid after a period of delay. Although the majority of courts to consider this issue have found that ERISA does not provide a remedy for those who seek interest on delayed benefit payments rather than payment of benefits themselves, both…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dunnigan v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  2. Helen Dunnigan, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  3. Douglas Dobson v. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc., Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  4. Harrison v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  5. Torah Soft Ltd. v. DrosninDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API