Legal Opinion

Whitney v. Fisher

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 16, 1980No. 144-79PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBillings, J.

The sole issue in this case is whether as a matter of law a woman may recover for loss of consortium based on her husband’s injuries. If so, the judgment below granting plaintiff, Donna Lee Whitney, such a recovery must be affirmed.

This action was commenced in 1976 upon a cause arising in 1973. On April 19, 1977, the legislature expressly authorized the bringing of an action for loss of consortium by either spouse with the enactment of 12 V.S.A. § 5431.

*470The operational effect of statutory provisions with respect to their retroactivity is governed by 1 V.S.A. § 213, unless otherwise provided.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Califano v. GoldfarbSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hay v. Medical Center Hosp. of VermontSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
  2. Town of Sandgate v. ColehamerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  3. Lorrain v. RyanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  4. Defoe v. PhillipSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2012
  5. Smith v. DesautelsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API