Legal Opinion

Velez v. De Lara

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided July 31, 1995No. 04-93-00369-CVPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STONE, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order entered by one district court judge setting aside a previous sanctions order entered by a different district court judge. Appellants contend the second trial judge was without authority to vacate the sanctions order because such orders can be reviewed on appeal only after entry of a final judgment on the merits. We find that the trial court had authority to set aside the order of sanctions and that it did not abuse its discretion in ruling on appellants’ motions for additional sanctions. To the extent the trial court’s order was a contempt…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Bodnow Corp. v. City of HondoTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Fruehauf Corp. v. CarrilloTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Ex Parte CardwellTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Norman v. NormanTexas Supreme Court · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ramirez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1998
  2. Markel v. World Flight, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
  3. Vernco Construction, Inc. v. David Nelson, Individually and D/B/A Collective Contracting, a Sole Proprietorship And E.E. Hood & Sons, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Orion Enterprises, Inc. v. Pope, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
  5. Chambers v. Rosenberg, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API