Legal Opinion

Chambers v. Rosenberg

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided March 20, 1996No. 03-95-00325-CVPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

Russell Chambers appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion for contempt by Ronald Rosenberg. Chambers contends that Rosenberg’s actions violated an agreed temporary injunction and an agreed final judgment and permanent injunction. The trial court held that the temporary injunction was void ab initio because no bond was executed. The court found that the final judgment was vague, ambiguous, overly broad, and unenforceable, but did not find it void; the court simply denied the motion for contempt. We will affirm the order of the trial court.

We cannot review the denial of the motion…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fulton v. FinchTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Lancaster v. LancasterTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Norman v. NormanTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Ex Parte LesherTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Goodwin v. GoodwinTexas Supreme Court · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bankler v. Vale, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002
  2. In the Interest of B.A.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2004
  3. Ebony Lake Healthcare Center v. Texas Department of Human Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
  4. Cline v. ClineCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
  5. Qwest Communications International Inc. v. AT & T Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API