Legal Opinion

Hopkins v. Phœnix Insurance

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 8, 1889PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Woodbury District Court. — Hon. GIeorge W. Wakefield, Judge. Action upon a policy of insurance. A judgment was rendered for defendant upon a trial by the court without a jury. Plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Beck, ‘ J.

I. The case was first tried to a jury, and a verdict had for plaintiffs, which, on motion, was set aside, and a new trial had to the court without a jury. No question arises upon this appeal involving any other ruling of the district court, except the judgment for defendant rendered upon the evidence, which is alleged to be erroneous, in that it is without the support of the evidence; and but a single question of fact is in controversy, namely, whether the policy before the loss occurred had been cancelled. The issuing of the policy, and the loss of the property insured by fire,.are…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hillock v. Traders InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Artificial Ice Co. v. Reciprocal ExchangeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  2. Home Insurance v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
  3. Miller v. Insurance Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Fisher v. Globe & Rutgers' Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  5. Addia v. Insurance Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API