In re Inman

O’Connell., Acting Chief judge,

delivered the opinion of the coiirt:

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office sustaining the Primary Examiner’s .rejection of claims 11,12, 13, and 14 of the appellant’s application No. 136,389 for a patent on- a chlorinated hydrocarbon on the ground of unpatentability over prior .art and failure to distinguish-patentably from the claims of appellant’s co-pending application No. 136,388, now involved here in appeal No. 6161 which is a companion to the present appeal. ,

Claim 11, which is typical of the appealed…