Legal Opinion

Solar v. Dominick's Finer Foods, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 23, 1978No. 77-1935PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE GOLDBERG

delivered the opinion of the court:

This record raises an issue of implied indemnity which will soon become of historic value only. (Skinner v. Reed-Prentice Division Package Machinery Co. (1977), 70 Ill. 2d 1, 16-17, 374 N.E.2d 437.) The point arises on the sufficiency of pleadings after the trial court struck and dismissed a counterclaim which sought codefendant indemnity. The counterplaintiff has appealed.

Geraldine Solar (plaintiff) filed her third amended complaint against Dominick’s Finer Foods, Inc. (Dominick’s), and S. A. Barnes Company, Inc. (Barnes).…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Skinner v. Reed-Prentice Division Package MacHinery Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Renslow v. Mennonite HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Shaw v. LorenzIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Muhlbauer v. KruzelIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Carver v. GrossmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bednar v. Venture Stores, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  2. Altevogt v. Tom Brinkoetter & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. Malauskas v. Tishman Construction Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. Ciosek v. Indiana Harbor Belt RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. Marchi v. Indiana Harbor Belt RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API