Legal Opinion

Malauskas v. Tishman Construction Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 4, 1980No. 79-608PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE GOLDBERG

delivered the opinion of the court:

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill (SOM) and Commercial Light Co. (Commercial) have appealed from an order which dismissed with prejudice their third amended third-party complaint against Economy Mechanical Industries, Inc. (Economy).

The complaint of plaintiff William P. Malauskas contained two counts. Count I alleged SOM was an architectural firm which prepared drawings, plans and specifications for the job in question. Commercial was a subcontractor for and engaged in electrical work at the job. SOM, Commercial and two other…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Muhlbauer v. KruzelIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Burke v. Sky Climber, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Gowdy v. RichterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  4. Frisch v. International Harvester Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  5. Burgdorff v. International Business MacHinesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bartsch v. Gordon N. Plumb, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  2. Roche v. County of LakeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  3. Casati v. Aero Marine Management Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. First Tennessee Bank, N.A. v. MunganCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
  5. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. StellingsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API