Malauskas v. Tishman Construction Corp.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE GOLDBERG
delivered the opinion of the court:
Skidmore, Owings & Merrill (SOM) and Commercial Light Co. (Commercial) have appealed from an order which dismissed with prejudice their third amended third-party complaint against Economy Mechanical Industries, Inc. (Economy).
The complaint of plaintiff William P. Malauskas contained two counts. Count I alleged SOM was an architectural firm which prepared drawings, plans and specifications for the job in question. Commercial was a subcontractor for and engaged in electrical work at the job. SOM, Commercial and two other…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Muhlbauer v. KruzelIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
- Burke v. Sky Climber, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1974
- Gowdy v. RichterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
- Frisch v. International Harvester Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- Burgdorff v. International Business MacHinesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bartsch v. Gordon N. Plumb, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- Roche v. County of LakeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
- Casati v. Aero Marine Management Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- First Tennessee Bank, N.A. v. MunganCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. StellingsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991