Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. v. Cook
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ANDREWS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:
Presently before the Court are two motions to dismiss filed by Defendants. (D.I. 25, 29). Mr. Cook, Mr. Gregor, and Ms. Whitaker (collectively “the Delaware Defendants”) move pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). Kelmar moves pursuant to Fed, R, Civ. P. 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6), and 12(b)(7). The issues have been My briefed. (D.I. 26, 30, 33, 35, 36, 38). The Court heard oral argument. (D.I. 45). For the reasons stated herein, the Delaware Defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and Kelmar’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED.
I.…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Marathon Petroleum Corp. v. Secretary of Finance Ex Rel. DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Marathon Petroleum Corp. v. CookDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2016
- Eaton Corporation v. GeisenbergerDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2020
- Univar, Inc. v. GeisenbergerDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2019