Legal Opinion

Cummings v. City of Lakin

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 12, 2003No. 89,674PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Nuss, J.:

This case concerns the interpretation of the notice of claims statute, K.S.A. 2002 Supp. 12-105b. Based upon the district court’s interpretation, it dismissed Connie Cummings’ personal injury lawsuit against the City of Lakin as untimely. The Court of Appeals affirmed in Cummings v. City of Lakin, 31 Kan. App. 2d 532, 67 P.3d 166 (2003). We granted Cummings’ petition for review, since another panel of the Court of Appeals appears to have reached dissimilar results 2 months later when it interpreted the same statute. See J.P. Asset Co. v. City…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. King v. PimentelCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
  2. State v. AnthonySupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  3. Martin v. Board of Johnson County Comm'rsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1993
  4. International Ass'n of Firefighters, Local No. 64 v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  5. Stevenson v. City Council of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Myers v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  2. Foos v. Terminix & Zurich America InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  3. Myers v. BOARD OF JACKSON COUNTY COMM'RSSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  4. Continental Western Insurance Co. v. ShultzSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  5. Reindl v. City of LeavenworthDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API