King v. Pimentel
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Wahl, J.:
Jerry King filed this action against Ralph Pimentel, Howard Uhl, Bobby Dale Collier, and the City of Topeka (City), alleging, inter alia, abuse of process, malicious prosecution, and a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). King appeals from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants on all claims.
The facts are relatively simple. Jerry King is a licensed mechanical contractor in the City. On March 21, 1988, King contracted with Drycleaning Equipment Company of Irving, Texas, (DECO) to supervise the installation of mechanical systems, including a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Terminate Control Corp. v. HorowitzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Todd v. KellySupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
- Pork Motel, Corp. v. Kansas Department of Health & EnvironmentSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- Lindenman v. UmscheidSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Orr v. HeimanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- Sleeth v. Sedan City HospitalSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- Whaley v. SharpSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- Miller v. BrungardtDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1996
- Bell v. Kansas City, Kansas, Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.