Legal Opinion

Continental Western Insurance Co. v. Shultz

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 5, 2013No. 103,776PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Biles, J.:

State law requires anyone bringing a claim against a municipality under the Kansas Tort Claim Act, K.S.A. 75-6101 et seq., to provide that municipality with prior written notice of the claim. K.S.A. 2012 Supp. 12-105b(d). This requirement exists to advise the municipality of the time and place of the injury and allow it to ascertain the character and extent of the injury before suit is filed. Dodge City Implement, Inc. v. Board of Barber County Comm'rs, 288 Kan. 619, 639, 205 P.3d 1265 (2009). Among other things, the notice must include “a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Myers v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  2. Myers v. BOARD OF JACKSON COUNTY COMM'RSSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  3. Orr v. HeimanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  4. Dodge City Implement, Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  5. James v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sleeth v. Sedan City HospitalSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  2. Whaley v. SharpSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  3. Arnold v. Olathe, Kansas, City ofDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2019
  4. E.D.H., by and through Meghan Hernandez v. Alex Leintz, et al.District Court, D. Kansas · 2026
  5. Farmers Bank & Trust v. Homestead Community DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API