Legal Opinion

M. Halff & Bro. v. O'Connor

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 10, 1896PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEILL, Associate Justice.

This suit was brought by the appellee against appellants and R. W. Rogers on the draft and contract set.out in our conclusions of fact, for $5000, as liquidated or stipulated damages.

The petition charged that R. W. Rogers, under an agreement and understanding with M. Halff & Bro. which constituted a partnership, was about to visit Victoria, Texas, to purchase for himself and appellants, appellee’s cattle, etc.; that in the furtherance of such purchase on their joint account, and, as express authority to Rogers, the letter of March 7, 1893, copied in our conclusions of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Eakin v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Yetter v. HudsonTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Merriman v. FultonTexas Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. McElroy v. DancigerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Reinhardt v. BordersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  3. Shropshire v. Commerce Farm Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Garrard v. CantrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. Nelson v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API