Legal Opinion

MCC Eurochem v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided July 8, 2011No. Slip Op. 11-80; Court No. 10-00260PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM and ORDER

GORDON, Judge:

The court previously granted Defendant’s motion to dismiss Count 2 of Plaintiffs complaint (Compl. ¶ 11), which challenged the U.S. Department of Commerce’s “zeroing” methodology. MCC Eurochem v. United States, 35 CIT -, 753 F.Supp.2d 1369 (2011) (“Opinion and Order”). The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has subsequently issued two decisions, Dongbu Steel Co. v. United States, 635 F.3d 1363 (Fed.Cir.2011) and JTEKT Corp. v. United States, 642 F.3d 1378 (Fed.Cir.2011), which indicate that Plaintiffs zeroing claim has merit. The court is therefore…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  2. Jtekt Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  3. McC Eurochem v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McC Eurochem v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API