Legal Opinion

Dawkins v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 2, 1922No. 23625PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from Sixth Judicial District Court, Parish of Ouachita; Fred M. Odom, Judge. Action by Tom Dawkins against W. R. Mitchell and others. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtOverton, J.

In May, 1912, plaintiff purchased 30 shares of the capital stock of the Union National Bank, paying therefor $3,300, which at that time was the value of the stock. On the last day of December, 1914, there was a surplus in the bank amounting to $47,156.98; and according to the allegations of plaintiff’s petition, his portion of this surplus, based on his shares, amounted to $090. In June, 1915, the bank was placed in the hands of a receiver, due to the fact that it had become Insolvent. .The receiver sold the assets of the bank. From the sale there was realized the sum of $115,400. The amount…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wallace v. Lincoln Savings BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Cooper v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
  3. Chetwood v. California National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Knoop, Hanneman & Co. v. BlafferSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1887
  5. Howe v. BarneyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Glod v. BakerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. Gulf Insurance Co. v. Employers Liability Assur. Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Company v. Hattie A. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  4. Levy v. BilleaudSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  5. Beyer v. F & R Oilfield Contractors, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1981

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API