Legal Opinion

Silvey v. Mallinckrodt, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 1998No. 73051PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRANE, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff poultry owners appeal from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of defendant vaccine manufacturers on the ground that plaintiffs’ common law claims against defendants for damages suffered as a result of their use of an infected poultry vaccine were preempted by federal regulations. Plaintiffs primarily claim that the trial court erred in finding all of their causes of action to be preempted by federal APHIS regulations. We agree and hold that the claims stated in Counts I through V, to the extent that they seek damages for defendants’ failure…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. FCCSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. City of New York v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Lynnbrook Farms v. Smithkline Beecham CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  5. Murphy v. SmithKline Beecham Animal Health GroupDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Empire District Electric Co. v. GaarMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Cooper v. United Vaccines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API