Peters Shoe Co. v. Murray, Assignee
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from the County Court of Wilson. Tried below before Hon. Thomas P. Morris, Special Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
FLY, Associate Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment against appellant in a suit in which it was sought to recover the sum of $375.20 from appellee as the assignee of A. B. Briscoe. The cause was tried by the court without the aid of a jury, and to the findings of fact alone can this court look for its conclusions of .fact, there being no statement of facts in the record.
From the findings of fact it appears that on April 28, 1902, the firm of Murray, Houston & Co. were indebted to appellant in the sum of $375.20, and on that date á draft was drawn for that sum by appellant on its…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Peters v. BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Commercial Bank of Pa. v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Cragie v. . HadleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Citizens Bank v. Bradley, ExaminerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Wichita Falls Compress v. W. L. MoodyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Chetopa State Bank v. Farmers & Merchants State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- Dollar v. Lockney Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- First State Bank of Bristow v. O'BannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.