State v. W. M. Meador & Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Chief Justice.
The construction given to the statute by the Court of Appeals finds further support in a decision of this court in Lee v. Cunningham, 234 Ala. 639, 176 So. 477, and by the United States Supreme Court in Raley & Bros. v. Richardson, 264 U.S. 157, 44 S. Ct. 256, 68 L.Ed. 615, involving a tax on a merchandise broker. Though there are expressions in the opinion of the Court of Appeals which are at variance with the ruling here in Ex parte State of Alabama (In re: State of Alabama v. Thomas Stein) 29 Ala.App. 565, 199 So. 11, present term, and not to be approved, yet the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- JE Raley & Brothers v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Lee v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- State v. SteinAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940
3Cited by3 opinions
- Leibold v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- State v. SteinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- City of Birmingham v. Hoffman & RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955