Tuttle v. Tuttle
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChristianson, J.
In this action the plaintiff seeks to recover damages in the sum of $300,000, which she alleges she has sustained by reason of a certain judgment, wrongfully obtained against her by the defendant. The defendant demurred to the complaint on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The demurrer was sustained, and the plaintiff has appealed.
The sole question presented on this appeal is whether the trial court was correct in ruling that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The substance of the complaint is as…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Crescent City Live Stock Co. v. Batchers' Union Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Shultz v. ShultzIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Alston v. UlmanTexas Supreme Court · 1873
- Shary v. EszlingerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
- Hutchins v. LockettTexas Supreme Court · 1873
3Cited by15 opinions
- Andrews v. O'HEARNNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Hamilton v. HamiltonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Hull v. RolfsrudNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
- Harchenko v. HarchenkoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
- Simpkins v. BrooksDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.