Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Harris v. Hinkle
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 28, 1924No. 18801PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
This is an original application for a writ of prohibition to prohibit and arrest- the action of the secretary of state, who, it is alleged, threatens to receive and honor withdrawals of signatures from petitions for initiative measure No. 49, the so-called “School Bill.”
The secretary of state has said, as alleged in the petition, that he will not consider the names of those signers for the measure who have filed written requests ó'f withdrawal in his office, and that he will permit those who wish to withdraw their names to do so at any time before he completes the canvass and count of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State ex rel. Case v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Alaska Coast Co. v. Alaska Barge Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
- Winsor v. BridgesWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- State ex rel. Mohr v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- State ex rel. White v. Board of State Land CommissionersWashington Supreme Court · 1901
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- North Bend Stage Line, Inc. v. Department of Public WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- State Ex Rel. King County v. State Tax CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- State Ex Rel. Lafollette v. HinkleWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- Halgren v. Welling, SEC. of StateUtah Supreme Court · 1936
- Citizens Council Against Crime v. BjorkWashington Supreme Court · 1975
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.