Legal Opinion

United States v. Eighteen Various Firearms

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 17, 1993No. Civ. A. No. 91-6519PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

JOYNER, District Judge.

This matter comes before the court upon plaintiffs motion for voluntary dismissal of all claims against defendant pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2). Defendant filed a response in opposition to the dismissal motion as well as a cross-motion for summary judgment.

This controversy began as long ago as 1968 while the claimant George E. Fassnacht, the owner of the various firearms at issue, was employed by the Central Intelligence Agency and stationed in Southeast Asia. While abroad, Mr. Fassnacht learned of the enactment of the Federal Gun Control Act of 1968…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Paoli Railroad Yard Pcb LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  2. John Evans Sons, Inc. v. Majik-Ironers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Citizens Savings Ass'n v. FranciscusDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Shulley v. MileurDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Waterloov Gutter Protection System Co. v. Absolute Gutter Protection, L.L.C.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
  2. Mobil Oil Corp. v. Advanced Environmental Recycling Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API