Mobil Oil Corp. v. Advanced Environmental Recycling Technologies, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Counterclaim Plaintiffs, Advanced Environmental Recycling Technologies, Inc (“AERT”), Motion To Dismiss Counterclaims Under Rule 41. (D.I. 578). For the reasons discussed below, AERT’s Motion To Dismiss will be granted, and the counterclaims will be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2).
Background
In September 1993, the Court bifurcated the issues in this case for trial. (D.I.170). The first trial addressed the patent claims raised in the Complaint filed by Mobil Oil Corporation and the patent law…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lefteri Poulis and Athena Poulis, His Wife v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard Pcb LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Lunn v. United Aircraft Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1960
- DuToit v. Strategic Minerals Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1991
- United States v. Eighteen Various FirearmsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
3Cited by3 opinions
- Peltz Ex Rel. Estate of Peltz v. SEARS, ROEBUCKDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- Marquinez v. Dole Food Company Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2025
- SILVERTOP ASSOCIATES, INC. v. KANGAROO MANUFACTURING, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2021