Legal Opinion · Dissent

Signal Companies, Inc. v. Harbor Ins. Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1980No. L.A. 31201Published

1Dissent

STANIFORTH, J.*

I dissent.

Harbor Insurance Company (Harbor) consented to Pacific Indemnity Company’s (Pacific) pretrial settlement of a commonly insured loss claim made against The Signal Companies (Signal) for an amount $10,000 in excess of Pacific’s (the primary insurer’s) policy limits. By reason of these admitted facts and the explicit words of paragraph 2(b) of Conditions of its contract, Harbor was required to “contribute to the costs incurred” on behalf of its insured Signal “in the ratio that its proportion of the ultimate net loss as finally settled bears to the total agreed…

2Cases cited81 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API