Legal Opinion

State v. Davidson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 28, 1992No. CX-90-1304PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TOMUAN0YICH, Justice

In this appeal, the State asks us to overturn a split decision of the court of appeals holding that the state’s obscenity statute, Minn.Stat. § 617.241, is void for vagueness under art. I, § 7 of the Minnesota Constitution, thereby invalidating respondent’s conviction for distributing obscene materials. Respondent cross appeals on the grounds that (1) the statute violates the free speech/press clause of Minn. Const, art I, § 3; (2) that the statute is overbroad in violation of the state due process clause, Minn. Const, art I, § 7; (3) that the statute violates the right of…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Steven Calvit v. Minneapolis Public Schools Four Winds School Donna GrantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  2. State v. WicklundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  3. County of Kenosha v. C & S MANAGEMENT, INC.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  4. McCollum v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  5. State v. MellettCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API