Legal Opinion

In Re Horton

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.

Decided December 3, 2008No. 18-23371PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DETERMINING THAT LAST CLAUSE OF “HANGING PARAGRAPH” DOES NOT APPLY TO MOTOR VEHICLES

ROBERT A. MARK, Bankruptcy Judge.

Debtor’s motion to value collateral raises yet another “hanging paragraph” issue which has generated conflicting opinions from bankruptcy courts: If a motor vehicle was acquired by the debtor for business use within one year of bankruptcy, is that vehicle an “other thing of value” as that term is used in the last clause of the hanging paragraph thereby precluding stripdown of the secured claim under § 506? This Court joins the majority of courts which have said no. If a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re HayesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2007
  2. In Re EllegoodUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
  3. In Re CurtisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2006
  4. In Re LittlefieldUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 2008
  5. In Re HickeyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nebraska · 2007

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re TanguayUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2010
  2. In re McPhilamyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2017
  3. In re SandiferUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API