Hoffman v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

NARICK, Senior Judge.

The issues on appeal are whether the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) abused its discretion by not remanding this case to the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) for additional evidence and whether Claimant was concurrently employed at a second job at the time of his work-related injury for purposes of calculating his average weekly wage (AWW).

The relevant facts are as follows. On July 19,1989, Daniel Hoffman (Claimant) suffered a work-related injury while working for Acme Markets, Inc. (Employer). By Notice of Compensation Payable, Claimant received total…