Legal Opinion

Strickland v. Jackson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 18, 1963No. 106PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.

The parties to the present controversy have shown a disposition to stand strictly upon their legal rights. Discretionary power vested in the judges of superior court to permit amendments to pleadings (G.S. 1-161; Electric Co. v. Dennis, 255 N.C. 64, 120 S.E. 2d 533; Dobias v. White, 240 N.C. 680, 83 S.E. 2d 785;) has not been invoked.

The appeal from the Mintz judgment had the effect of suspending further proceedings pending the appeal. The suspension, however, was lifted when this Court’s affirming Certificate was received in the Superior Court of Pitt County on April 3, 1963. As of that date…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dobias v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Teague v. Siler City Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Modern Electric Company v. DennisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Dudley Ex Rel. Dudley v. DudleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. D & W, INC. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Hendrix v. AlsopSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Hendrix v. AlsopCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API