Legal Opinion

People v. Pakula

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 29, 1980No. 79-260PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Barry

The defendants, Annette Pakula and her husband, Steven Pakula, were indicted by a Will County grand jury for the offense of possession of more than 500 grams of a substance containing cannabis. The cannabis was seized by the police from the defendants’ back yard where it was growing. Prior to trial, the defendants moved to suppress the cannabis. The trial court granted defendants’ motion to suppress, ruling that even though the cannabis was plainly observable from outside the premises of the defendants’ home and yard, and the police could discern that it was cannabis from a location where…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. PitmanIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Commonwealth v. GovensSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Commonwealth v. HuffmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Hoffman v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  5. People v. De La FuenteAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API