Bush & Cook Leasing, Inc. v. Tracy
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Bush & Cook contends that the book treatment of an item is not controlling in characterizing the property as an intangible versus a tangible asset. It also contends that the BTA incorrectly adopted the true-object test or incorrectly applied it. Bush & Cook claims that the substance of the leases was to lease tangible personal property and not to sell vehicles to lessees. The commissioner, to the contrary, maintains that the manner in which Bush & Cook recorded these leases on its books is the manner in which it must report them for the franchise tax. We agree with the commissioner and affirm…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wheeling Steel Corp. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Equilease Corp. v. DonahueOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Edwards Industries, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Gray Horse, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Armour & Co. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. WilkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2005
- Bush & Cook Leasing, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1999