Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Tracy
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
Goodyear posits as its sole proposition of law.that “[a]n intangible asset representing a retirement plan surplus is not includible in the numerator of the property fraction set forth in R.C. 5733.05(A) and used to apportion net worth.”
R.C. 5733.05(A) provides that the numerator of the property factor fraction is to be “the net book value of all the corporation’s property owned or used by it in this state.” Goodyear argues that, for purposes of determining this numerator in its 1987 return, the pension surplus was not property “owned or used” by it. It emphasizes that the trust assets were…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bush & Cook Leasing, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1997
3Cited by3 opinions
- Willacy v. Cleveland Bd. of Income Tax Rev. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- NASCAR Holdings, Inc. v. McClainOhio Supreme Court · 2022
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1999