Legal Opinion

Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. Wilkins

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 2005No. 2004-0273PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.

{¶ 1} At issue in this case is whether appellee, Federated Department Stores (“Federated”), was correct in reporting a negative net worth on its 1993 Ohio corporation franchise tax report. We find that the record supports the determination by the Board of Tax Appeals that it was, and thus we affirm that decision.

{¶ 2} Federated filed for bankruptcy protection in 1990. As Federated prepared to emerge from bankruptcy, it filed its 1993 Ohio corporate franchise tax report indicating that the company’s taxable net worth in Ohio on February 1, 1992, was negative $334,536,641. In that same report,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. American National Can Co. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Columbus City School District Board of Education v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Edwards Industries, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Gray Horse, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. NitscheOhio Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API