Legal Opinion

Knott Bros. v. Jefferson Street Ferry Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1881PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Multnomah. This was a writ of review, issued from the circuit court for Multnomah county, upon the petition of the appellants, for the purpose of examining the record of the county court of that county in a proceeding for granting a ferry license, on the application of the respondent. The line of the proposed ferry was across the "Willamette river, between the foot of Jefferson street, in Portland, and the foot of IT street, in East Portland.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Multnomah. This was a writ of review, issued from the circuit court for Multnomah county, upon the petition of the appellants, for the purpose of examining the record of the county court of that county in a proceeding for granting a ferry license, on the application of the respondent. The line of the proposed ferry was across the "Willamette river, between the foot of Jefferson street, in Portland, and the foot of IT street, in East Portland. "Upon the return of the writ, with certified transcript annexed, the cause was heard in the circuit court, and the decision of the county…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Watson, J.:

The most important question to be determined here, arises upon the construction of the deeds from Stephens and wile to Joseph Knott, of March 25, 1861, and January 22. 1862. What interests did they convey? The arguments of appellants’ counsel are predicated on the assumption that they conveyed all the rights which the grantors had, as riparian owners, to the use of their land for ferry landing purposes. In this, we think, they are clearly wrong. There is but one ferry mentioned in these deeds. The perpetual and exclusive right to the use of the river front for ferry…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Peck v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1814
  2. Bowman v. WathenDistrict Court, D. Indiana · 1841
  3. Davenport v. BradleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1822
  4. Wiswall v. WandellNew York Court of Chancery · 1848

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Goldsmith v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API