Legal Opinion
Arabian American Oil Co. v. Scarfone
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided May 19, 1989No. 84-1536-CIV-T-17PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ALAIMO, Chief Judge.
Before the Court is plaintiff's motion to alter or amend the judgment. As plaintiff is not the proper party to recover under the statutory claims involved herein, the motion will be denied absent ratification by, or joinder of, the real party in interest. BACKGROUND
Arabian American Oil Company (“ARAMCO”) instituted this suit against Lee Scarfone and his business, Architect Lee Scarfone Associates (“ALSA”), alleging breach of contract, fraud, violations of federal and state racketeering statutes (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq.; Fla. Stat. § 895.01 et seq., and the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lubbock Feed Lots, Inc., and Lockney Cooperative Gin v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- U-Haul International, Inc., an Oregon Corp. v. Jartran, Inc., a Florida Corporation, and James A. RyderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- County of Oakland v. City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Anitora Travel, Inc. v. LapianDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Motta v. Resource Shipping & Enterprises Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Berman v. LinnaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- In Re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. Tires ProductsDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2001
- Muzuco v. Re$ubmitIt, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2013
- Conneely v. Butterworth Jetting Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- City of Philadelphia v. Public Employees Benefit Services Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.