Legal Opinion
City of Philadelphia v. Public Employees Benefit Services Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 13, 1994No. Civ. A. 93-0048PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PADOVA, District Judge.
This case involves alleged violations of state and federal securities laws and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-68, in connection with a municipal employee deferred compensation plan. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c), defendant has filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings. For the reasons set forth below, I shall grant in part and deny in part defendant’s motion.
I. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
Plaintiffs amended complaint contains the following factual allegations, which I must assume as true for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- CFE International LLC v. Guillermo Turrent Schnaas, et al.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2026