Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Slavens

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1992No. 91-1741PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Our review of the record supports the board’s findings and its recommendation. Therefore, we order that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio with appropriate restitution to be *164made prior to any application respondent files for reinstatement to the practice of law. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Douglas and H. Brown, JJ., concur. Holmes, Wright and Resnick, JJ., dissent and would disbar respondent.

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GalinasOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. ClarkOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Toledo Bar Assn. v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. TomlanOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Toledo Bar Ass'n v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API