Mouty v. Sandy City Recorder
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DURRANT, Justice:
¶ 1 To resolve the present controversy, we must determine whether a city ordinance that amends the permitted and prohibited uses of land in a particular zoning category can be subjected to the referendum process. If the ordinance in question is referable, we must then determine whether the ordinance is a “land use law,” a class of referable laws subject to a higher signature threshold than generally required. We conclude that the ordinance is referable and that it is not a “land use law.”
BACKGROUND
¶2 At stake in this case is whether the voters of Sandy City, Utah, will be…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Carrier v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- TP. OF SPARTA v. SpillaneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- Sandy City v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1992
- O'Keefe v. Utah State Retirement BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1998
- Wilson v. ManningUtah Supreme Court · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Carter v. Lehi CityUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- Boyle v. ChristensenUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- Friends of Maple Mountain, Inc. v. Mapleton CityUtah Supreme Court · 2010
- Save Beaver County v. Beaver CountyUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- Mawhinney v. City of DraperUtah Supreme Court · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.