Legal Opinion

Mouty v. Sandy City Recorder

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 2005No. 20050101PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURRANT, Justice:

¶ 1 To resolve the present controversy, we must determine whether a city ordinance that amends the permitted and prohibited uses of land in a particular zoning category can be subjected to the referendum process. If the ordinance in question is referable, we must then determine whether the ordinance is a “land use law,” a class of referable laws subject to a higher signature threshold than generally required. We conclude that the ordinance is referable and that it is not a “land use law.”

BACKGROUND

¶2 At stake in this case is whether the voters of Sandy City, Utah, will be…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Carrier v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  2. TP. OF SPARTA v. SpillaneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  3. Sandy City v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  4. O'Keefe v. Utah State Retirement BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Wilson v. ManningUtah Supreme Court · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carter v. Lehi CityUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Boyle v. ChristensenUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Friends of Maple Mountain, Inc. v. Mapleton CityUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Save Beaver County v. Beaver CountyUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Mawhinney v. City of DraperUtah Supreme Court · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API