Legal Opinion

O'Keefe v. Utah State Retirement Board

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1998No. 970052PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

We granted certiorari to review a court of appeals decision upholding a decision of the Utah State Retirement Board (“the Board”) in which the Board refused to accept retirement contributions from Joseph O’Keefe’s employer, Ogden City, for hours O’Keefe worked in excess of forty per week. See O’Keefe v. Utah State Retirement Bd., 929 P.2d 1112 (Ct.App.1996), cert. granted, 939 P.2d 683 (Utah 1997). The court of appeals held that under section 49-4-103(1)(e)(i) of the Public Safety Retirement Act (“PSRA” or “Act”), see Utah Code Ann. §§ 49-4-101 to -704, work in excess of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Morton International, Inc. v. Auditing Division of the Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Zoll & Branch, P.C. v. AsayUtah Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Archer v. Board of State Lands & ForestryUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Commercial Investment Corp. v. SiggardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Ward v. State of UtahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  2. Carrier v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  3. I.M.L. v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Arndt v. First Interstate Bank of Utah N.A.Utah Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Cannon v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2000

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API