Legal Opinion

Henry v. Halliburton

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 29, 1985No. 66335PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLIVER, Judge.

This case involves a defamation action brought by appellants, Roy M. Henry and St. Louis Financial Planners, Inc., against respondent William K. Halliburton. 1 Respondent moved to dismiss the petition for failure to state a cause of action upon which relief can be granted. The trial court sustained the motion and dismissed the petition. The court of appeals affirmed. The cause was certified to this Court by a dissenting judge pursuant to Rule 83.01. We affirm.

I

Both appellants and respondent were engaged in the business of selling life insurance. Two of appellants’ prospective…

2Cases cited85 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Nazeri v. Missouri Valley CollegeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Rice v. HodappSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  3. Ken Hammer v. The City of Osage Beach, Missouri, and Jim SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  4. Patrick D. Kelly v. Marc GoldenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  5. MacKe Laundry Service Ltd. Partnership v. Jetz Service Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API